Field Community Consolidated School District 3
Field Community Consolidated School District 3 is located in south Illinois. Field Community Consolidated School District 3 has 51.75 square miles of land area and 0.36 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Field Community Consolidated School District 3 population is 2,768. Field Community Consolidated School District 3 median household income is $51,875 in 2010-2014. Field Community Consolidated School District 3 median house value is $103,300 in 2010-2014. On average, Field Community Consolidated School District 3 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Field Community Consolidated School District 3 Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 315 | 328 | 298 | 299 | 303 | 320 | 309 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 0.00 | NA | 17.50 | 17.68 | 19.90 | 20.90 | 17.70 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 0.00 | NA | 16.00 | 17.12 | 17.40 | 18.40 | 12.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 3.70 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 0.00 | 17.60 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 6.50 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 6.27 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 1.00 |
Other Support Services: | 0.00 | 10.33 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.50 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 17.03 | 16.91 | 15.23 | 15.31 | 17.46 |
Schools
Field Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 21075 North Hails Ln, Texico IL 62889 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.3% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.0% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 54.0% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 59.4% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.7% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 60% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 43.3% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.0% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 47.8% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 55.3% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 43.4% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.0% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 48.2% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.1% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,329,000 | $7,815 | $2,577,000 | $8,619 | $2,463,000 | $8,129 | |||
Federal: | $154,000 | $517 | 6.6% | $253,000 | $846 | 9.8% | $364,000 | $1,201 | 14.8% |
State: | $1,566,000 | $5,255 | 67.2% | $1,743,000 | $5,829 | 67.6% | $1,511,000 | $4,987 | 61.3% |
Local: | $609,000 | $2,044 | 26.1% | $581,000 | $1,943 | 22.5% | $588,000 | $1,941 | 23.9% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,201,000 | $7,386 | $2,117,000 | $7,080 | $2,253,000 | $7,436 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,042,000 | $6,852 | $1,895,000 | $6,338 | $2,116,000 | $6,983 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,236,000 | $4,148 | 60.5% | $1,156,000 | $3,866 | 61.0% | $1,252,000 | $4,132 | 59.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $25,000 | $84 | 1.2% | $23,000 | $77 | 1.2% | $78,000 | $257 | 3.7% |
Administration: | $276,000 | $926 | 13.5% | $264,000 | $883 | 13.9% | $244,000 | $805 | 11.5% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $505,000 | $1,695 | 24.7% | $452,000 | $1,512 | 23.9% | $542,000 | $1,789 | 25.6% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $41,000 | $138 | $101,000 | $338 | $6,000 | $20 | |||
Construction: | $13,000 | $44 | $5,000 | $17 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $11,000 | $37 | $13,000 | $43 | $16,000 | $53 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,159,000 | $3,889 | $1,091,000 | $3,649 | $1,242,000 | $4,099 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $794,000 | $2,664 | 68.5% | $756,000 | $2,528 | 69.3% | $856,000 | $2,825 | 68.9% |
Other Salary: | $365,000 | $1,225 | 31.5% | $335,000 | $1,120 | 30.7% | $386,000 | $1,274 | 31.1% |
Total Benefit: | $474,000 | $1,591 | $445,000 | $1,488 | $504,000 | $1,663 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $334,000 | $1,121 | 70.5% | $321,000 | $1,074 | 72.1% | $358,000 | $1,182 | 71.0% |
Other Benefit: | $140,000 | $470 | 29.5% | $124,000 | $415 | 27.9% | $146,000 | $482 | 29.0% |
* Field Community Consolidated School District 3 was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.